Packers XLV

Will Packers Seize the Moment?

Posted January 14th, 2011 @ 02:01pm

NFL analysts and fans have had the week to break it down, to consider what may take place on the field at Georgia Dome Saturday night. Despite being a #6 vs. #1 matchup, it's seen as a virtual coin flip between the Packers and Falcons.

On the Pack's side, you consider the first matchup: with two missed scoring chances in the red zone, the fourth down questionable catch by Gonzalez, the late penalty on Matt Wilhelm. Despite all this, the Pack lost on a last second field goal. Then you consider the momentum--winning three straight de facto playoff games, and the way they won the last one: in part, on the surprisingly effective legs of James Starks. Add it all up and the Packers feel good about their chances in a rematch.

On the Falcons side, they feel like last year's favorite toy. They earned the number one seed with the conference's best offensive balance, a solid defense and one of the best home field's in the league. They have a Pro Bowl quarterback, a Hall of Fame tight end, a receiver who's a re-incarnation of Sterling Sharpe and a back who evokes memories of "Ironhead" Heyward." Yet, they feel so 2010.

The top seed in the NFC has fared very well in this round over the last 10 years, going 8-2, though the two losses have come in the last four years. In the AFC, the #1 has been much more vulnerable on this weekend.

In the first Packers-Falcons meeting, Green Bay was utterly unable to move the ball on the ground, except with Rodgers. it forced them to run a lot of five wide, empty backfield sets and allowed the Falcons pass rush to pin back their ears and attack the QB. Conventional wisdom says the Pack should be able to do a better job this time around. Starks was a revelation against the Eagles, but to expect a carbon copy performance is foolish.

The Falcons are very good defensively against the run, but just 22nd in the league against the pass. I expect Starks to do enough to keep the defense honest, but would be surprised if he even approaches last week's production. By the same token, I expect the Pack to perform much better against Michael Turner. His yards per carry has gone down precipitously the last few weeks--under three yards per carry. Now the week off may have him feeling refreshed, but if the Packers' defense plays the way is did the last three weeks against the run, Turner should not be a major factor.

This game will come down to which QB avoids a key mistake and makes a big play at the end. Matt Ryan is 0-1 as a playoff starter, having lost to Arizona two years ago. He's been listening to the Aaron Rodgers love-a-thon during the week and is anxious to join the conversation of "elite QBs." A win this week may get him there, but it won't be easy. While Rodgers has a full complement of talented receivers, Ryan has two. In the first game, Green Bay did a great job keeping Roddy White from making any big plays. Gonzalez caught six balls for 51 yards--including a couple of huge grabs. Ryan was 24-28 in that game for just under 200 yards. That kind of efficiency will be good enough to get another W. It will be up to the defense to put more pressure on him and force him into a mistake or two.

It feels like this is the game where Rodgers picks up the team on his shoulders and says, 'I got this.' After the red zone issues in the first meeting and the third quarter fumble last week, Rodgers probably feels like he owes the team one. But let's not forget he delivered what was, for me, his signature play of the season in Atlanta: the fourth and goal laser to Jordy Nelson that tied the game at 17 with a minute to go.

Defensively, the Pack is healthier and more sound  than the first meeting. Jenkins should be close to 100% and the recent play of linebackers Walden and Bishop is a main reason this unit is winning games for this team. The team has watched film and listened to their coaches scream about the poor tackling in the first meeting. Expect that problem to be rectified.

The Falcons win the special teams battle, with a Pro Bowl returner in Weems and a steady reliable kicker in Matt Bryant. It better not come down to special teams or the Pack may be sunk.

So, do you go with the team that hasn't played a meaningful game since December 27th? Whose offensive coordinator spent part of the week interviewing for the Browns head coaching job? Whose QB has yet to win a playoff game and whose key defensive players (Abraham, Robinson, Lofton, Babineaux) were all limited in practice on Thursday?

Or do you go with the team that's won three straight lose-and-your-out games? The team whose QB has now won a playoff game and is the first in NFL history to throw seven TD passes in his first two playoff starts. The team whose running game now has a pulse and whose defense is playing on a par with the Steelers and Ravens.

Yeah, me too. Pack 27  Falcons 23

Post a Comment:

Please Enter the Validation Code Below

Comments (23):

amazing! i love this post! would you mind if i shared?

on December 18th, 2011 at 01:14am

This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I've joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!

on December 18th, 2011 at 01:33am

That is the right weblog for anyone who wants to search out out about this topic. You realize a lot its almost exhausting to argue with you (not that I actually would wantHaHa). You undoubtedly put a new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, just great!

on December 18th, 2011 at 07:15am

The website offered to us has some exciting functions. It realy increase my knowledge about the topic.

on December 18th, 2011 at 09:38am

Hello! I have read some of your post here and found it interesting and it makes a lot of sense. Plus i love your theme here. Thumbs up! Keep on sharing!

on December 21st, 2011 at 01:38pm

The following time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I mean, I know it was my option to read, but I really thought youd have something attention-grabbing to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you possibly can repair should you werent too busy looking for attention.

on December 21st, 2011 at 08:48pm

It is definitely nice notion dude.iam definitely proud of you . Do u have twitter?? i want to comply with you .thx

on December 22nd, 2011 at 01:59am

very nice put up, i certainly love this web site, carry on it

on December 22nd, 2011 at 08:31pm

This site is the thing i have started seeing many other websites. You people are at the first of my list of favorites and i have discover the motivation to begin my own

on December 23rd, 2011 at 10:12pm

Hello! I stored it to my laptop^^ Nice post.

on December 27th, 2011 at 01:26am

Hey! cool post you have there. Thank you:D

on December 29th, 2011 at 12:12am

I must say that this post is the most relevant article I've ever read and saw. It's a great help to everyone who is looking for this information.

on December 30th, 2011 at 03:48am

Be glad of life because it gives you the chance to love, to work, to play, and to look up at the stars.

on December 30th, 2011 at 08:44am

thanks for share!

on February 25th, 2012 at 04:56am

Adoro me mostrar peladinha na web cam

on February 27th, 2012 at 07:41pm

Hi Dave, I think you meant to say Matt Wilhem (#57). I think he's the linebacker who committed the facemask in the first game.

on January 14th, 2011 at 10:20am

Sounds like you might have Matt Wilhelm (#57) confused with Erik Walden (#93). I heard P.A. confuse the two the other day on the radio as well. Tough to keep up with all the new replacements!

on January 14th, 2011 at 10:36am

Fixed, thanks guys.

on January 14th, 2011 at 12:24pm

Defensively, I believe we will have a better answer for Michael Turner. Fewer missed tackles will help our cause. -- While most agree that Starks won't duplicate last weeks effort, I think 75 yards with a few 10 yard pops is quite possible, and will be more than adequate. -- This year, James Jones has usually made up for earlier blunders in the following week. I anticipate that this week. I think JJ will have a big game. With all the attention on the wideouts and Starks, don't be surprised to see Andrew Quarless come up with a few big catches. Especially out of the Jumbo Bone package if he's in the game. -- Not to jinx the squad but I see a 31-17 game going the way of the Green and Gold. Go Pack!

on January 14th, 2011 at 12:54pm

I hope this is not a bad omen on things to come. For us Wisconsin based teams the Badgers lost a big lead late in their basketball game at Michigan State when Bo Ryan was 30 -1 when leading with under 4 minutes left. Marquette's basketball team had an 18 point lead with 5 minutes left and lost the game at Louisville. You know what they say about bad things in "3"'s.....please no tough loss to Atlanta. GO PACK GO !!

on January 15th, 2011 at 12:24pm

?????? ?? ???? ??????????? ! ???? ?????? ? ??? ???? ??????????? ?????? ??????? !!! ?????? ?? ?????????? ??? ?????? ! ??? ?? ???? ?? ?? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ???????? !

on January 29th, 2012 at 04:17am

? ??? ????? ??????????? ???? ????????? ???? ?????? ? ????? ????? ? ?????

on March 2nd, 2012 at 08:21am

? ??? ????? ??????????? ???? ??????? ???? ????? ? ????? ????? ? ?????

on May 23rd, 2012 at 02:11pm

Blog Archive


Has Rodgers played his last game in green and gold?

Powered by: Avallo Panel